Madison County, Virginia 1810 Census by John Vogt
SKU: 9542776674

Madison County, Virginia 1810 Census by John Vogt

Sale price$11.69 Regular price$12.99
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Madison County, Virginia 1810 Census by John VogtJohn Vogt's transcription of the Madison County, Virginia 1810 Census, from the original images. Illustrations, maps. Arranged by alpha letter. Census returns are some of the first records that a genealogist turns to when studying a new family line. Unfortunately for Madison County, as well as Virginia as a whole, both the 1790 and 1800 census reports for that state are lost. While the reason for their loss is argued, they nevertheless no longer

John Vogt's transcription of the Madison County, Virginia 1810 Census, from the original images.

Illustrations, maps. Arranged by alpha letter.

Census returns are some of the first records that a genealogist turns to when studying a new family line. Unfortunately for Madison County, as well as Virginia as a whole, both the 1790 and 1800 census reports for that state are lost. While the reason for their loss is argued, they nevertheless no longer exist. While personal property tax and land tax lists (which date from 1782) can be used to give some information about individuals, they do not give the researcher a glimpse into family composition or a snapshot of the county as a whole. Hence Madison's 1810 census is the first real window we have from the census records of this county which had been settled a century before and whose western boundary was the top of the Blue Ridge Mountains.

With the advent of the computer age and the publication of most of these early censuses, one would expect that many of the genealogist's problems would be resolved. Unfortunately, this has not happened. While many researchers rely completely upon online census records, these are often flawed by misread names and missing names altogether. The problem is the difficult reading of the documents, which often are written in a tight, cramped hand and with a myriad of possible readings. The close similarity between "S" and "L," "F" and "T", and recognizing the secretarial s, which appears as "ss" in the middle of words but not as an ending, can lead to nightmares in translation. Oftentimes, there is no distinction between an "e", an "o", and an "a" unless the reader is familiar with the family names within the document. These are only a few visual issues facing the transcriber. The author has been fortunate to have a professional background in paleography and history, both medieval and modern. In transcribing the current volume, comparison was made with other documents, as well as carefully examining each questionable character under magnification to ascertain the true intent of the writer. In the process, it became apparent that sometimes the census recorder himself was not familiar with strange-sounding German names or heavy Scottish brogues. One spelling would appear in the first encounter with the family, and then later on in the document a different spelling would be given for the same family surname. In brief, computerized lists, while useful, do not give a total and accurate picture of the data. The census was recorded in booklet form, consisting of twenty sheets of paper that were folded in the middle and written on in landscape fashion. So when the first half of the first page was filled with information and turned over, the back of that sheet became page two. In addition, the census enumerator conserved paper by writing in a very tiny hand, and herein lies the problem with "a", "e" and "o" in the body of a name. Only by carefully examining the transitions between characters can an accurate reading be obtained.

This and other 1810 censuses are transcribed by the author from the original images, and while many of Virginia's censuses are available online, they oftentimes are replete with misreadings. Caveat emptor!

Surnames found in this book:

Agan, Ahart, Ahart, Allen, Anderson, Andrews, Archer, Aylor

Back, Baily, Baker, Ballard, Banks, Barbour, Barnes, Barnett, Bates, Batton, Beal, Beckham, Berry, Bickers, Blakey, Blankenbeker, Blunt, Bohannon, Booker, Booten, Bowlin, Bradford, Bradly, Braner, Breden, Brickard, Briggs, Brock, Bronaugh, Brooking, Brooks, Brown, Broyles, Bryant, Burbridge, Burnett, Burriss, Bush, Bussell

Canady, Carder, Carpenter, Carter, Cauthron, Cave, Chapman, Chatham, Cheek, Chelf, Chelph, Clack, Clatterbuck, Clore, Cobler, Coleman, Collins, Cook, Corbin, Cox, Crigler, Crow, Cubbage

Davis, Deboard, Deer, Delph, Dobbs, Duff, Dulany

Early, Eastham, Eddins, Edwards, Estes

Fanny, Faukner, Field, Finks, Fishback, Fleshman, Floyd, Ford, Foster, Fox, Fray, Fry, Fulks

Gaar, Gains, Gallohugh, Garnett, Garriott, Garten, Gee, George, Gibbs, Glassell, Good, Gowen, Graves, Grayson, Green, Griffen, Grimsley, Gully

Hagirt, Harberson, Harrison, Hartsuck, Harvey, Hassel, Haynes, Henderson, Henshaw, Hensley, Herndon, Hill, Hollenback, Holmes, Holtzclaw, Hood, Hooper, Houlder, Houltzclaw, House, Howell, Hudgeon, Huffman, Hume, Hundley, Hunt, Hunter, Hurt, Hutcheson, Hutson

Jackson, James, Jarrell, Jennings, Jinkins, Johnston, Jones, Jordine

Kanady, Kemper, Kirtly, Klugh, Kyle

Lacey, Lackey, Layton, Leach, Leathers, Lewis, Lightfoot, Lillard, Limerick, Lindsey, Lipp, Lockson, Long, Loyd, Lumpkin

Macon, Madison, Major, Mallory, Marquess, Marshel, Mason, May, McCollester, McDaniel, McKenzie, McQuin, Medley, Miller, Milton, Mitchell, Moore, Morgan, Morris, Moubray, Murphey, Murry

Newman, Nickols, Nooe

Ody, Overton

Petty, Pilcher, Pollard, Porter, Powell, Pratt, Prise

Rambottom, Razer, Razor, Reddish, Redwell, Rice, Richards, Rider, Rinden, Rinor, Roberts, Robertson, Roebuck, Rogers, Ross, Rosser, Rosson, Rouse, Rouzee, Rowe, Rucker, Runnolds, Rush, Rutter

Sampson, Samuel, Sanford, Sanner, Scales, Scott, Seal, Sherly, Shingleton, Silvy, Simco, Simms, Simpson, Skinner, Slater, Slaughter, Smith, Smithson, Smoot, Snell, Snyder, Southard, Souther, Sparks, Sparks, Stanton, Stevens, Stewart, Stockdell, Stone, Stonsiffer, Story, Stowers, Strother, Swetman, Swindel, Synor

Tanner, Tates, Tatom, Taylor, Terrell, Terry, Thomas, Tigner, Tinsley, Tippett, Towles, Tucker, Turner, Twyman, Tylor

Underwood, Utz

Varnon, Viney, Vinyard

Waginor, Walker, Wallace, Ward, Watson, Watts, Waugh, Wayland, Wayman, Weaver, Weekley, Welch, Welles, White, Wilhoit, Wilsher, Wilson, Witherall, Wood, Wright, Writtenhouse

Yager, Yowell, Yowell

Zakary, Zimmemon

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 9542776674

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 1904 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Canopus
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Good Size..easy to pack
Size: 6.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Great travel size, I always pack two. Goes on easy, and it works. SPF50 is perfect for me, and a may get a little tan, butit does work. Just don't get it in your eyes..
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
kim mcfall
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Best sunscreen
Size: 6.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
My favorite sunscreen!! It works great & doesn’t feel greasy!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
Jazzy
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Basic Sunscreen, Nice Smell
Size: 6.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Good smell, came packaged well. No issues so far. Will update if it doesn't work well under the summer sun.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Karlie
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 4
It works
Size: 6.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Well this product works. At first I thought maybe the Caribbean sun wasn’t as bad as people said since I was in the sun for 4 days wearing this sunscreen and hardly had tan lines, then I tested my theory for 1 day with another brand and got a sunburn. I took star off (would really only do a half if it allowed) for when you go in the water or if you sweat there is a bit of white residue that it leaves. But for sun purposes, if you want protection, I highly recommend.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gabriele Testore
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
A must have for superior sun protection!
Size: 6.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1), Size: 6.7 Fl Oz (Pack of 1)
Neutrogena Beach Defense SPF 50 is an absolute game-changer when it comes to sun protection. Whether you're relaxing at the beach, swimming, or enjoying an outdoor adventure, this sunscreen provides broad-spectrum protection that effectively shields the skin from harmful UVA and UVB rays. One of its standout features is its lightweight texture, it glides effortlessly onto the skin without feeling greasy or heavy. Unlike some sunscreens that leave a sticky residue, Beach Defense absorbs quickly and smoothly, making it ideal for both face and body application. Another major plus? Water resistance! This formula stays put, even after swimming or sweating, ensuring continuous protection throughout the day. And despite its strong defense against the sun, it feels refreshing and comfortable on the skin, making reapplication a breeze. I used it during a vacation in the Dominican Republic, and me and my family enjoyed it. My 5 years old girl has been protected from the sun all the time. If you're looking for reliable, effective, and easy-to-use sun protection, this sunscreen is an excellent choice. Highly recommended! ☀️👌
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2025

recommand products