Alexander 163 Rotary CC Tuba
SKU: 85991482840

Alexander 163 Rotary CC Tuba

Sale price$6795.00 Regular price$7550.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 7 - Jul 12

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Alexander 163 Rotary CC TubaThis is a new Alexander CC tuba built in 2023, in stock here at The Horn Guys. 163 CC tuba Five rotary valves by Meinlschmidt, bronze bushings and Minibal linkages Fifth rotor tuned to flat whole step, right hand, open wrap yellow brass body with nickel trim and gold brass leadpipe gold brass bell with engraved nickel kranz fixed thumb ring Clear lacquer finish Josef Klier TA1 mouthpiece Weight: 20. 0 lbs. A recent mouthpiece test on the 163 included

This is a new Alexander CC tuba built in 2023, in stock here at The Horn Guys.

163 CC tuba

  • Five rotary valves by Meinlschmidt, bronze bushings and Minibal linkages
  • Fifth rotor tuned to flat whole step, right hand, open wrap
  • yellow brass body with nickel trim and gold brass leadpipe
  • gold brass bell with engraved nickel kranz
  • fixed thumb ring
  • Clear lacquer finish
  • Josef Klier TA1 mouthpiece
  • Weight: 20.0 lbs.

 

A recent mouthpiece test on the 163 included its Klier TA1, a Robert Tucci RT-50 and RT-88.  The TA1 gives the most centered presence and lively German sound.  The RT-50 has less presence down low.  The RT-88 would be the favorite with some practice.  Its larger size helps facilitate smoother slurs like from F# to G# and helps give voluminous tone.  The Tucci Paul der Groß might be a good choice too.

Pitch is good.  All the harmonics are really close up and down the range, arpeggios feel good, within just a few cents.  The open C lies a little higher than the open G, both octaves, it settles when you fill up the horn.  A better player than I would line up the C-G better naturally.  E below the staff feels better with third valve as is common.  In the staff, open E is fine, no need for 1+2.  This Alex will work with you, it's not stiff.  As you learn where to blow this horn, it's pretty flexible and you shouldn't expect much slide pulling.

One client asked about the open wrap fifth slide.  I don't mind its placement, reaching through the fifth loop to pull the first slide is easy.  The left hand can support the tuba near the third rotor and its fine.  Others may wish to do their first slide handling by reaching through the fourth slide.  The fifth loop is inboard from the top bow and bell so remains out of the way during travel.

The Alexander 163 has a nice balance of traits due to its large body and larger .808" (20.5mm) bore through its long rotary valve block.  It doesn't back up in the low range like a 186, and it's not too voluminous like a 6/4 size.  This instrument is very light for a large tuba.  It weighs 20.5 lbs (9.3kg).  You'll find you can sound louder and clearer with less effort on an Alexander.

Workmanship is outstanding.  All slides are fit very tightly, rotors are silent, all joints and alignment and buffing are perfect.  The lacquer is flawless, heirloom quality.  Ships a la carte, in a Cronkhite Cordura case (shown), Miraphone gig bag or Winter hard case.

Robert Tucci comments on which mouthpiece he likes for the Alexander:

On the "Alexander" CC-Tuba, it seems you have a unique instrument
compared to all the heavy metal made by others.  I would have to play
one of the modern versions.  Many years ago, early Seventies, I bought
one but could not come to terms with the intonation.  The PT-6 rotary,
christened the "York-xander" by Ivan Hammond, was much easier to play. 
I do have memories of listening to Chester Schmitz/BSO when the
orchestra was in DC (1967-68).  He sounded very good on both the CC and
the F. Other than that, Ronny Bishop got great results, even with a
rather unorthodox approach to slide manipulation etc. There are various
Szell-era Cleveland recordings where he sounds really good. One is "Hary
Janos" for example. As for a mouthpiece, our larger models might result
in too much intonation spread.  My answer for anything old and German is
the PT-82.  This is based on the traditional "apple-shaped" cup approach
all the old-times used, but with a larger cup and throat and a decent
time. The RT-72 is in some ways similar yet smaller.  That would offer
good control over the intonation.  Those who once played the 163 used
much smaller mouthpieces (Sixties-Seventies) than are common nowadays.

-Robert Tucci 1.2.21

_____

The Alexander model 163 tuba has been in limited production for many decades, both in BBb and CC.  The modern CC 163 has been redesigned since the old days.  It's larger, less quirky, and right in tune up and down.  And it's still as light in weight and response as you remember.

This hand made professional CC tuba is custom built in Mainz, Germany. Its rotary valves are .808" bore, and construction is very light yellow brass sheet with optional gold brass bell, or all gold brass body. The bell is made the old fashioned way, with a large hand-hammered piece of brass finished with triangle seams. This method of production requires a fair amount of skill and is considered a superior way to build a bell flare. It doesn't get much classier than an Alexander tuba. These are very light instruments, and they're simply alive when you play them. Similar lightweight models are made by Rudolph Meinl, Gronitz, and Adams, and all these are distinct from the heavier offerings from B&S, Miraphone, and Willson. Older Alex tubas have had a reputation for quirkiness. However these new models are most excellent - this is a modern design. The sound of this horn is a classic orchestral tuba sound: large bore, rotary valves, light bell. The Meinlschmidt rotors are fast and silent. The response is almost immediate and the tone is pure and rich with a powerful sonic quality. Check out the amazing details and hand engraving in the photos. Most players who stop by the shop find this to be one of their favorite large CC tubas.

Included

  • JK mouthpiece
  • cloth storage bag
  • lubricants
  • Cronkhite Soft Case

 

Who won an audition on an Alexander 163 tuba?

National Symphony - won by David Bragunier in 1961
Boston Symphony/Boston Pops - won by Chester Schmitz in 1966
Cleveland Orchestra- won by Ronald Bishop in 1967
Cincinnati Symphony/Cincinnati Pops - won by Mike Thornton in 1976
Houston Symphony - won by David Kirk in 1982
U.S. Army Field Band - won by David Zerkel in 1986
U.S. Army Band - won by David Zerkel in 1990
Florida Philharmonic - runner up Lee Hipp in 1991
San Antonio Symphony - won by Lee Hipp in 1991
Oklahoma City Philharmonic - won by Ted Cox in 1993
Greenwich Village Orchestra - won by Ben Vokits in 2010

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 85991482840

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 909 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
Sue
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Paper plates
Item Package Quantity: 50, Size: 10 Inch Plate
Paper plates sturdy ,pretty too
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mima
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Good value
Item Package Quantity: 50, Size: 10 Inch Plate
Good, sturdy plates. Great in the microwave. Leak resistant.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
Sheri Lynn
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent
Size: 50 Count
Amazon Basics Ultra Paper Bowls, 20 oz, are a practical choice for anyone needing disposable bowls for everyday use or special occasions. Whether you're hosting a casual get-together, packing lunches, or simply want an easy cleanup option after a meal, these bowls offer a convenient solution. They are sturdy enough to hold both hot and cold foods without bending or leaking, which makes them versatile for soups, salads, snacks, and more. One of the standout features is their generous 20-ounce capacity, providing ample space for a satisfying portion. The bowls have a simple, clean design that fits well in any setting, from picnics to office lunches. Users appreciate their durability and the fact that they are lightweight and easy to stack, saving storage space. Additionally, being disposable, they eliminate the hassle of washing up, which is always a plus for busy households or events. Overall, these Amazon Basics paper bowls deliver solid performance at a budget-friendly price. They strike a nice balance between functionality and convenience, making them a reliable choice for anyone looking to simplify mealtime cleanup. If you want disposable bowls that handle a variety of foods without fuss, these are definitely worth considering.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gabriella
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
These paper bowls are actually really sturdy for disposable bowls!
Size: 50 Count, Size: 50 Count
These paper bowls are actually really sturdy for disposable bowls! We use them for everything from cereal and soup to quick toddler meals, and they hold up well without getting soggy or flimsy. I also love that they’re microwave safe, which makes busy days a little easier. Great quality for the price and always handy to keep stocked at home!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Amber
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
My paper bowls of choice.
Size: 50 Count
I have been a return buyer of these bowls and amazon basics plates, as they are sturdy and well made, even for liquids. I think there is a generous quantity for the price. I use for my to go meals on the way to work, so I dont have my whole kitchen accumulating in my car. They are good sized and you can fit a decent serving. Will keep buying.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 8, 2026

recommand products