SKU: 65796171737

CANADIAN MUSCLEHUNK OIL WRESTLING 4 DVD

Sale price$44.10 Regular price$49.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $12.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 16 - Jul 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

CANADIAN MUSCLEHUNK OIL WRESTLING 4 DVDCAST: Jimmy Royce, Doug Davis, Steve Arnold, Jeff Hunt, Wyld Child, John St. James, Paul Perris, Roman Stone, DIRECTOR: RON SEXTON RELEASE DATE: 4 25 2008 BOUT #1: JIMMY ROYCE VS. DOUG DAVIS: ROYCE: 5'10", 180#, 22. DAVIS: 5'10", 170#, 24. Within 30 seconds of the opening of this match the oil and Davis's handling have forced one whole side of Jimmy's trunks into his ass crack. Wonder of wonders, Doug Davis actually wins the second fall and with a

CAST: Jimmy Royce, Doug Davis, Steve Arnold, Jeff Hunt, Wyld Child, John St. James, Paul Perris, Roman Stone,

DIRECTOR: RON SEXTON

RELEASE DATE: 4/25/2008

BOUT #1: JIMMY ROYCE VS. DOUG DAVIS: ROYCE: 5'10", 180#, 22. DAVIS: 5'10", 170#, 24. Within 30 seconds of the opening of this match the oil and Davis's handling have forced one whole side of Jimmy's trunks into his ass crack. Wonder of wonders, Doug Davis actually wins the second fall and with a hold so juicy you may linger forever on freeze or frame by frame it's a combo full nelson/body scissors and as the camera zooms in on a frontal of Royce in agony notice the way the oil makes the trunks sag around and outline Jimmy's nice sized cock. Delicious indeed!" Doug is not so lucky in the third fall. A seated surfboard with Royce's foot in Doug's lower back gives Jimmy beautiful leverage to extract a pained submission from Davis. A very sexy visual matchup with some great holds sold by some awesome suffering. BOUT #2: STEVE ARNOLD VS. JEFF HUNT: ARNOLD: 5'8", 200#, 21. HUNT: 5'11",195#, 23. Those in to bicep flexing will be more than satisfied in the "oiling-up" segment. This dude has some beautiful "guns." He's up this time against a grappler closer to his own height and weight. But for Steve this match does not begin so auspiciously. If this were about winning on points, Steve Arnold definitely would be in the lead going into the final two minutes or so. He was using his huge muscular thighs to torture the midsection of his opponent, Jeff Hunt. But Jeff shocked Steve with a literal "head-cracking" head butt. Check out this portion of this bout yourself. That laid Arnold out flat, setting him up for an easy camel clutch win for Hunt. Fans of sexy-type trunks will enjoy this bout. The oil highlights all the hills and valleys, and especially on Hunt you'll enjoy the frontal views. We give Arnold the "humpiest ass" award and Hunt the "full crotch" award. A very good visual and grappling matchup. BOUT #3: WYLD CHILD VS. JOHN ST. JAMES: WYLD CHILD: 6',170#, 23. ST. JAMES: 5'7",145#, 24. A knee to the gut doubles up St. James as the second fall opens. Wyld Child now is taking him a lot more seriously. And even though holds come and go due to the slipping and sliding of wrestling in a greasy pit, Wyld Child keeps up his pressure on St. James throughout the second fall. He takes St. James with what we can describe only as an unusual version of the bow and arrow. Wyld Child has St. James helpless and on display, in virtual freeze frame muscle action, in a hold that looks very painful. St. James does the only thing he can, submit! When John St. James puts Wyld Child into a double hammer and grips his neck from behind, we think it could be an upset victory for St. James if he has the strength to hold on to it. No way! Wyld Child uses his brawn to force his way out and after a little more wrestling puts his own version of a double hammer lock on a stomach-down St. James. It's a neat one with one of the Child's huge thighs bearing down on the hold for added leverage and force. A double biceps flex with Wyld Child's foot on a wasted St. James nicely sums up the victory for the Canadian Musclehunk. BOUT #4: PAUL PERRIS VS. ROMAN STONE: PERRIS: 5'10",170#, 20 yo. STONE: 6',190#, 23 yo. The grapplers continually challenge each other as to who can do the deeper and wider splits. Roman Stone is good with the splits but you can tell that at some point he locks. Paul Perris knows no lockpoint when it comes to splits, although he has told us in the past that if he goes over 2 minutes in that position it does begin to hurt. That's why if any wrestler can keep Perris locked in a splits position for more than two minutes, he'd definitely have to give up. There is a point in the first fall when Perris and Stone approach each other frontally from a mutual splits position. They throw their arms around each other in a kind of mutual embrace. Hot as hell!! If you are into handsome faces and magnificent physiques grappling in oil! You will enjoy this matchup to the max. Perris wears a g-string, and Stone wears orange trunks that show off his fine muscularity to the utmost advantage.
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 65796171737

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
R
Verified Purchase
Ray
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Compact, lots of power, great for travel.
I tested it at full power. It does what its advertised to do. At full power it does get fairly warm, not near warm enough to be a hazard. It can't be covered up, It may overheat if it's covered with stuff. I got it for travel. It will charge my computer, tablet and phone just fine. It shares the 65W, so charging of each device may slow as you plug in more devices
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2026
W
Verified Purchase
Will
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 4
Sticks out a lot.
Nice and reliable no problems so far. but does stick out the wall more than other models.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
RobSauce
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
The Only Charger You’ll Ever Need!
The Anker 735 Charger (GaNPrime 65W) is a total game-changer for anyone tired of carrying multiple "bricks" for their laptop, phone, and earbuds. It packs a massive amount of power into a surprisingly small, foldable design. What I liked: True All-in-One: With two USB-C ports and one USB-A port, it can fast-charge a MacBook Air, an iPhone, and AirPods all at the same time. Intelligent Power Allocation: It uses PowerIQ 4.0 technology, which automatically detects the power needs of each connected device and adjusts the output in real-time for the fastest possible charge. Ultra-Compact: Thanks to GaN (Gallium Nitride) technology, it is about 53% smaller than a standard 67W laptop charger. The foldable plug makes it perfect for tossing into a travel bag or pocket. ActiveShield 2.0: I really appreciate the peace of mind that comes with its advanced temperature monitoring, which checks the heat over 3 million times a day to protect your expensive devices. Note: To get the full 65W speed for your laptop, make sure you are using a high-quality USB-C cable rated for 100W! Whether you’re working from a coffee shop or traveling internationally, this is the most reliable and efficient charging block on the market. It’s a bit of an investment, but the build quality and convenience are worth every cent.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 3, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Casey Manion
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
The 65W version is just as solid as the 47W I already own
I bought the 47W Anker Nano charger a while back and loved it, so when I needed a bit more power I grabbed this 65W version. Honestly, the experience is almost identical - which is exactly what I was hoping for. Same compact puck design, same foldable prongs that make it perfect for travel, same Anker reliability. I've been using it with my Samsung Z Flip 7 and it charges incredibly fast on fast charge mode. The phone recognizes it immediately and you can watch the percentage climb. But what I really appreciate about stepping up to the 65W model is the extra headroom. When I need to charge my laptop or other more demanding devices, this charger handles them without breaking a sweat. The 47W is great for phones and smaller tablets, but having that extra wattage gives me more flexibility. The folding prongs continue to be one of my favorite features. It's such a simple thing but makes a huge difference when you're tossing it in a bag. No snagging, no scratching other items. The size is still impressively small for the amount of power it delivers. This is one of those products that just works. No fuss, no weird charging issues, just plug it in and go. If you already have the 47W version and need more power, this is a no-brainer upgrade. If you're choosing between the two, I'd say go with the 65W unless you're absolutely certain you'll only ever charge phones and tablets. The peace of mind of having extra power available is worth it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Cataptra
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Crisp, bright, natural colors. Excellent monitor for the cost.
Size: 24 inch 100Hz
Excellent monitor. Haven't tried the internal speakers since I use amplified speakers and most often a headset through them. So probably an option I may never use anyway, but may test them out just to see how good they are...or how bad.😂 Color is crisp and clear and gave me the screen resolution I needed 1920x1080. Text is clear and legible, graphics are as good as your graphics card will allow, so if you're not using a high end graphics card don't expect this monitor to improve motherboard built-in graphics or older low end graphic cards, that's not the monitors fault, it's your MB or GC that's the problem. Overall I'm very happy with this monitor and been well worth the price I paid for. Yes, I'd recommend this monitor.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2026

recommand products