Pay in installments of $690.79 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
LEM LA 125-P CURRENT TRANSDUCER, 125AThis is a CURRENT TRANSDUCER, 125A product from LEM with the model number LA 125 PProduct details Sensor Output Closed Loop Response Time 1s Current Measuring Range AC 200A to 200A Supply Voltage DC Max 15V Product Range LA 125 P Supply Voltage DC Min 12V Accuracy % 0. 6% Current Measuring Range DC 200A to 200A Other details Brand LEM Part Number LA 125 P Quantity Each Technical Data Sheet EN All product and company names are trademarks or registered
This is a CURRENT TRANSDUCER, 125A product from LEM with the model number LA 125-PProduct details
| Sensor Output | Closed Loop |
| Response Time | 1µs |
| Current Measuring Range AC | -200A to 200A |
| Supply Voltage DC Max | 15V |
| Product Range | LA 125-P |
| Supply Voltage DC Min | 12V |
| Accuracy % | 0.6% |
| Current Measuring Range DC | -200A to 200A |
Other details
| Brand | LEM |
| Part Number | LA 125-P |
| Quantity | Each |
| Technical Data Sheet EN |
All product and company names are trademarks™ or registered® trademarks of their respective holders. Use of them does not imply any affiliation with or endorsement by them. Image is for illustrative purposes only. Please refer to product description.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 26 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great small soup bowls!
I bought these for a family party for soup. I was nervous they were going to be flimsy and cheap. I was pleasantly surprised how thick and sturdy they are! They were a perfect size for a smaller bowl of soup or chili. We even used them in the microwave for left overs and they held up great! There was no sagging or getting soggy which I was also worried about. They are definitely good quality. They are much better than the Walmart or cheap off brands. I also loved the price. I thought they were a great deal for the quality and quantity. The only con I had was some were hard to pull apart. It was no big deal though. I will definitely buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
★★★★★ 5
I Put 2 Raw Eggs in This Paper Bowl… (Video Included)
These paper bowls are smaller than standard size, and that’s actually exactly why I buy them. They’re perfect for kids’ snacks and portion control without overfilling or wasting food.
I was pleasantly surprised by how sturdy they are. These do not crumple easily like cheaper paper bowls, and they hold their shape well even when handled by kids throughout the day. We regularly use them for dry snacks like Goldfish crackers, cereal, and cookies, and a single bowl can last all afternoon through multiple refills.
They are also leak-resistant, which I tested more aggressively than most people probably would. I cracked two raw eggs into one bowl, swirled them around, and set a timer. After a minute, I it held up (over my head) without it bending or collapsing. That alone sold me on the durability. The end result - no leaks. Zero.
For the price, quality is excellent. If you’re looking for smaller bowls for snacks, portion control, these are a solid choice.
These aren’t your typical flimsy paper bowls — they’re surprisingly durable for everyday use. Kitchen Chaos Tested™ — and they passed.
⭐️I included a video of paper bowls vs raw eggs, plus some photos for size reference
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Sturdy and useful
Good plates, we used them all and had no spills or plate disasters. We used them for hot and cold food. Sturdy and saves me time on dishes! I also appreciate that they look nice even if it isn't for company. Great for draining bacon with a paper towel. So much easier. Also, from my home schooling days, these are great for kids when they want to paint. Holds the paint and it is somewhere to lay your brushes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 31, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent
The Amazon Basics Everyday Paper Bowls, 10 oz, offer a convenient and practical solution for casual dining and everyday use. Perfect for serving snacks, soups, or small portions, these paper bowls are designed for simplicity and ease of use, making them ideal for busy households, office lunches, or outdoor gatherings.
One of the standout features is their sturdy construction, which holds up well without leaking or bending easily. The 10-ounce size strikes a nice balance—not too big, not too small—perfect for a variety of foods. Users often appreciate how lightweight and disposable these bowls are, making cleanup effortless after meals or parties.
Overall, these paper bowls provide good value for the price, combining functionality with convenience. If you’re looking for a reliable, no-fuss option for everyday serving needs, the Amazon Basics Everyday Paper Bowls are worth considering. They make mealtime simpler without sacrificing practicality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Perfect smaller size, challenging to separate sometimes
We prefer to use the smaller paper bowls instead of the much larger ones, since they are more in tune with correct portion sizes. The size is perfect, the quality is fairly good, but docked one star because several times when wanting to get one bowl, it’s been a challenge to separate only one bowl. We would probably buy again, but these wouldn’t be our first choice.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 2026