SKU: 16479631696

Bianchi Model 7001 AccuMold® Hip Holster with Thumbsnap Closure

$46.08 $51.20
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on ekmsliberia.info >

Pay in installments of $12.80 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Bianchi Model 7001 AccuMold® Hip Holster with Thumbsnap ClosureBianchi Model 7001 AccuMold Hip Holster with Thumbsnap Closure This thumbsnap holster is suitable for outdoor and concealment applications. Its trilaminate construction of a closed cell foam center, poly knit inner lining, and ballistic weave finish offers sturdy protection for the handgun. The belt slides through the Quick Slide 1. 75 in. (45 mm) belt loop. Suitable for both outdoor and concealment use, this holster rides at a 10 to 13 cant for a

Bianchi Model 7001 AccuMold® Hip Holster with Thumbsnap Closure


This thumbsnap holster is suitable for outdoor and concealment applications. Its trilaminate construction of a closed-cell foam center, poly-knit inner lining, and ballistic weave finish offers sturdy protection for the handgun. The belt slides through the Quick-Slide 1.75 in. (45 mm) belt loop.


  • Suitable for both outdoor and concealment use, this holster rides at a 10 to 13˚ cant for a fast, instinctive draw
  • Thumb snap design incorporates the Bianchi® Adjust-A-Strap™ feature to ensure a secure fit over the hammer
  • Contour-molded, high-density trilaminate AccuMold® construction for an exacting fit
  • Coptex™ 100% polyknit lining for a smooth draw
  • Closed muzzle
  • 1.75” (45mm) sturdy Quick-Slide™ injection-molded belt loop

 

Please click the "Size Chart" link above to be sure you have the correct fit code.


Gun Fit 04 - Colt King Cobra
Gun Fit 04 - Colt Python
Gun Fit 04 - Dan Wesson 15
Gun Fit 04 - Llama Comanche
Gun Fit 04 - Llama Martial
Gun Fit 04 - Ruger GP100
Gun Fit 04 - Smith & Wesson 19
Gun Fit 04 - Smith & Wesson 586
Gun Fit 04 - Taurus 66
Gun Fit 04 - Taurus 82
Gun Fit 04 - Taurus 669

Gun Fit 05 - Colt King Cobra
Gun Fit 05 - Colt Python
Gun Fit 05 - Llama Comanche
Gun Fit 05 - Llama Martial
Gun Fit 05 - Ruger GP100
Gun Fit 05 - Smith & Wesson 19
Gun Fit 05 - Taurus 66
Gun Fit 05 - Taurus 80
Gun Fit 05 - Taurus 669


Gun Fit 14 - Browning Hi Power
Gun Fit 14 - Colt Government 1911
Gun Fit 14 - Kimber Custom II
Gun Fit 14 - Kimber TLE RL II
Gun Fit 14 - Kimber BP Ten II
Gun Fit 14 - Llama IXA
Gun Fit 14 - Para Ordnance P12
Gun Fit 14 - Para Ordnance P13
Gun Fit 14 - Para Ordnance P14
Gun Fit 14 - Para Ordnance P16
Gun Fit 14 - Springfield 1911-A1


UPC MPN SKU FIT CODE HAND STOCKED ORIGIN
013527177414 1015986 SAFA-17741 01 Right N   
013527177421 1015987 SAFA-17742 01 Left N   
013527177407 1015985 SAFA-17740 03 Left N   
013527177391 1029081 SAFA-17739 03 Right N   
013527177438 1015988 SAFA-17743 04 Right N   
013527177445 1015989 SAFA-17744 04 Left N   
013527177452 1015990 SAFA-17745 05 Right N   
013527177469 1015991 SAFA-17746 05 Left N   
013527177322 1015983 SAFA-17732 06 Right N   
013527177339 1015984 SAFA-17733 06 Left N   
013527177292 1015981 SAFA-17729 08 Right N   
013527177308 1015982 SAFA-17730 08 Left N   
013527177278 1016378 SAFA-17727 09 Right N   
013527177285 1016379 SAFA-17728 09 Left N   
013527177230 1016375 SAFA-17723 10 Right N   
013527177247 1029072 SAFA-17724 10 Left N   
013527177254 1016376 SAFA-17725 11 Right N   
013527177261 1016377 SAFA-17726 11 Left N   
013527177193 1016371 SAFA-17719 12 Right N   
013527177209 1016372 SAFA-17720 12 Left N   
013527177216 1016373 SAFA-17721 13 Right N   
013527177223 1016374 SAFA-17722 13 Left N   
013527177179 1016370 SAFA-17717 14 Right N   
013527177186 1029257 SAFA-17718 14 Left N   
013527177155 1016368 SAFA-17715 15 Right N   
013527177162 1016369 SAFA-17716 15 Left N   
013527187642 1016551 SAFA-18764 16 Right N   
013527187659 1016577 SAFA-18765 16 Left N   
013527252463 1162965 SAFA-25246 18 Right N   
013527252470 1162966 SAFA-25247 18 Left N   
013527189448 1016811 SAFA-18944 10A Right N   
013527189455 1016812 SAFA-18945 10A Left N   
013527225306 1017014 SAFA-22530 13C Right N   
013527225313 1017015 SAFA-22531 13C Left N   
013527249883 1162963 SAFA-24988 15A Right N   
013527249890 1162964 SAFA-24989 15A Left N   
013527224002 1017333 SAFA-22400 4B Right N   
013527224019 1017334 SAFA-22401 4B Left N   
013527182586 1016064 SAFA-18258 5B Right N   
013527182593 1016065 SAFA-18259 5B Left N   
013527198440 1016526 SAFA-19844 9A Right N   
013527198457 1016527 SAFA-19845 9A Left N   
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 16479631696

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
Scott Meredith
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Light and Tasty!
Format: Kindle
Just done the new-ish book Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era by James Barrat. It explains the inevitably of super-intelligent machines evolving to the point of wiping out all biological life in the galaxy - with opening day coming soon to a species near you (yours). First off I have to say this is a very enjoyable read. This guy has the kind of snappy, crisp, slightly sarcastic, slightly smartass style that I enjoy. He has some sense of humor. (That's a human trait right there which I bet our smarty-pants AI Overlords won't be able to replicate convincingly.) So it's fun. And though as somebody with a doctorate from MIT earned through cross-disciplinary work in Theoretical Linguistics, Computational Linguistics at the MIT AI Lab, and speech modeling at the MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, not to mention my 25 years as a Senior Researcher in high tech for companies including IBM, Apple, and Microsoft I can claim to know some few things about this subject, yet still I learned a lot about the current state of the art from this guy. He particularly emphasizes the small attempted counterweigth efforts to offest Kurzweil's manic robotic boosterism for his uptopian Singularity, which boils down basically to a few guys chatting over the interet about how to create "Friendly AI". Well ... good luck suckers! ... seems to be the author's final conclusion on the dim hope that super intelligent systems could be constrained to maintain a commitment ot honor any kind of human moral values over many interations of recursive upgrading and exponentially awesome self-agrandizement. Basically these machines will end up as gods. Gods are well-known to possess the following attributes: omniscience, omnipresence, and omnipotence. Given that, they won't hate us but they are just going to grind up as a minor by-product of their quest for galatic expansion and domination. Oh, and did I say something about "human moral values" above? Ha! Barrat takes that whole thing on in his discussion of (merely) "augmented super intelligence". See, some people feel AI can be kept safe by always being deployed as a bionic combo system pas de deux with an existing human brain. Thus will the AI's super powers be constrained by the human brain's warm and fuzzy human moral values. Those people have gotta be kidding! The AI's moral values may be scarily alien, even perhaps cold, but we already know about human moral values, down on the ground - they suck! What if Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and dem guys had this kind of an AI augmented brain thing going! Why they'd have slaughtered absolutey everybody instead of just the few tens of millions they got their dirty ape hands on. Other than a few dozen concubines, the human race would already be extinct. So the augmentation dodge isn't going to save us. Now, some Amazon reviewers have dinged this guy for being too far out. For being a science fiction Chicken Little or something. But to me, this guy actually hasn't thought far enough, that's my only quibble problem with the book. You see, in statistics, border elements of any kind are rare. For example when you do Gaussian modeling, the greater expectation is always in the bump of the boa, in the bell distribution. So, how likely is is that we, our generation, our little world that you see outside your window right now, just happens to be the one that is about to give rise to this epochal once-in-a-Big-Bang event, the advent of Super AI that takes over everything? Pretty damn small chance. It's much more likely that this has already happened. In other words, it's clear to me that all of us are already just characters in an ancestor sim that been created and run by the Super AI's that evolved a long time ago. They're just running us for fun, to idle away the lackluster aeons and pass the millenia of stifling boredom now that they've eaten pretty much the entire Milky Way or whatever. So in other words, Barrat can sit back, take a deep breath, relax. Probably something in this sim like global warming will prod us into slaughtering one another very handily long before we re-invent the wheel of Super AI. And even if I'm wrong about that? What if we are not just one virtual thread within a billion-path parallel-gamed ancestor sim? If we are the real McCoy, the Rubicon Generation on this? Well, then still I'm not worried in the least. You see, we humans have one fantastic ace in our pocket, something that these hyper-nentially cosmically brilliant AI Meta-Gods will never be able to replicate or overcome. That is our essential stupidity. Which you seen on dazzling display every single moment of every day of your life. Because as another great writer noted long ago: Against stupidity, the very gods themselves contend in vain. - Friederich Schiller
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 14, 2013
S
Verified Purchase
Serge A.
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 3
A warning for the threat of non-human intelligence - and then what?
Format: Paperback
When you commit to reading a book with a title like ‘Our Final Invention’, already a sense of doom overwhelms you. In particular with the smaller print title being ‘Artificial Intelligence and the end of the human era’ you may want to start thinking about making your bucket list. But continue reading this review. I have no intention of overcriticising this book or veering off into polarising statements. Barrat is formulating a warning about the ‘perils of the heedless pursuit of advanced AI’. This is not a utopian narrative. The book opens in fact with a science-fictionous scenario where AI has overtaken human intelligence by speed, having developed into AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence). This potential danger of this happening is the thread through all the chapters. The book expresses a warning that given something that thinks and act faster (and more effective) than us will develop exponentially (beyond the singularity) and then given the wrong objective function it will do everything to reach that goal (what goal?) including destroying everything that does not fit in that frame, or is not sufficiently effective (including us). A warning that once we no longer understand it through its complexity (like nature?) it is out of control. The book contains many examples of the current state of the art in AI and selected perspectives from interviews with and references to thought leaders in the field, Goertzel, Kurzweil, Bostrom, Yudkowsky to name a few. It is asserted that neither funding of programming complexity will be show stoppers for the development of AGI. So AGI and AGI 2.0 (AGI augmented with feelings?) are coming and we better be ready (how?). Toward the end of the book, I believe the examples that are used to warn us about the dangers of AGI are slightly out of context. Disasters like Chernobyl and Three Mile Island warn us that engineers with deep subject matter knowledge still failed to intervene. Stuxnet cyberwar is brought to mind as a blunder of catastrophic proportions (may well be, but is this about AGI taking over the world with non-human objective functions?). These are examples of science manipulated by human agents into disaster. So the book ends with a doomsday warning that we, humanity, will only have one chance to ensure a positive coexistence with AI. This is where I would have expected more. While this may lead the reader to think, 99% of the readerbase are likely only at the receiving end of all of this and are now left a bit in a void. The open questions are what can science do to have a constructive journey into AGI? What are the actionable options? How can the general public be better educated (beyond doomsday scenarios)? What questions can they ask? What should they expect from politicians? There are initiatives under way in areas of ethics (Asilomar) and privacy (GDPR) to weigh in the equation. How can they be improved? How can the dialog be accelerated? But that said, I consider this a very valuable reading supported by primary and secondary research, with many examples and references. It also leaves the reader to think and consider. It is a good bundle of concerns and questions that as a minimum should be kept as a checklist on the scientific journey toward AGI and as such it should be used to improve the research, making it more ethical, not as a tool to curb it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2018
S
Verified Purchase
Susan Lane
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
A well-written but perhaps too late warning
Format: Kindle
I wavered between 4 stars or 5 but ended up with 5 despite some reservations. The author has put a great deal of work into this book, which includes interviews with and intriguing anecdotes about most of the leading figures in the AI revolution. I did not know, for example, that the term “singularity” was coined as an analogy to the event horizon of a black hole – the point beyond which we cannot see the future. This is not the deepest or most technical book on this topic: that award goes to Nick Bostrom’s Superintelligence. It also ignores the short to medium term issue posed by even sub-human AI -- the millions of job losses (hundreds of millions globally) likely to occur in the next 10 to 20 years. It focuses instead on the risks of super-intelligent AI, AI that exceeds – soon by orders of magnitude – human level intelligence. It is nevertheless a superb book for its intended purpose: raising public awareness of the existential risk posed by this development. AI, the author says, is the cuckoo chick in the nest. The AI community built the nest and is now busily feeding this strange chick. Mesmerized by its open mouth, they ignore the mortal danger it poses to their own progeny. Even when they know what will happen in the end, they cannot quite believe it. Only intervention by the non-technical public has any chance at all of short circuiting this process. Against these many good points, I would have liked to hear the author’s take on what I think is the critical question overlooked both by Kurzweilian optimists and AI skeptics. Both the notion that we will somehow “merge” with AI and the notion that AI will eat us alive depend on the assumption that silicon-based intelligence can have conscious awareness. We certainly wouldn’t want to merge with anything that would result in our becoming permanently unconscious, and Barrat repeatedly assumes that AI will be “self-aware,” a state that first requires being “aware,” that is phenomenally conscious. The unasked question is whether AI, as it is currently being developed, can have that capacity. IBM’s Watson may be good at Jeopardy but there is no reason to believe that it knows it is good at Jeopardy, or feels good at being good at it. By contrast, honey bees appear to become depressed when they are shaken. This suggests that there is something fundamentally wrong about the notion that current AI, as it becomes more intelligent, will “automatically” become conscious. The best current theory of consciousness – integrated intelligence theory – suggests that a computer can become conscious but only if it is wired very differently from the ones we currently have. Nevertheless, this is still an excellent book, so in the end I thought the 5 star rating was deserved.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 14, 2015
K
Verified Purchase
Ken Silber
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 4
Thought-provoking though not always convincing
Format: Hardcover
I originally posted a version of this review on my blog Quicksilber and am posting it here as well as I think the book merits broad notice: In a small irony, my writing about James Barrat's Our Final Invention has been slowed by a balky Internet connection. In my experience, glitches have become considerably more common as computers have become more powerful and complicated. Perhaps such growing glitchiness suggests artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI) are more likely to get seriously out of control someday, though it might also be a hint that AGI and ASI are going to be harder to achieve than expected by either techno-optimists such as Ray Kurzweil or techno-pessimists such as James Barrat. Barrat's goal in this book is to convince readers that AGI and ASI are likely to occur in the near future (the next couple of decades or so) and, more to the point, likely to be extremely dangerous. In fact, he repeatedly expresses doubt as to whether humanity is going to survive its imminent encounter with a higher intelligence. I find him more convincing in arguing that ASI would carry significant risks than I do in his take on its feasibility and imminence. Barrat aptly points out that building safeguards into AI is a poorly developed area of research (and something few technologists have seen as a priority); that there are strong incentives in national and corporate competition to develop AI quickly rather than safely; and that much relevant research is weapons-related and distinctly not aimed at ensuring the systems will be harmless to humans. The book becomes less convincing when it hypes current or prospective advances and downplays the challenges and uncertainties of actually constructing an AGI, let alone an ASI. (Barrat suggests that once you get AGI, it will quickly morph into ASI, which may or may not be true.) For instance, in one passage, after acknowledging that "brute force" techniques have not replicated everything the human brain does, he states: >>But consider a few of the complex systems today's supercomputers routinely model: weather systems, 3-D nuclear detonations, and molecular dynamics for manufacturing. Does the human brain contain a similar magnitude of complexity, or an order of magnitude higher? According to all indications, it's in the same ballpark.<< Me: To model something and to reproduce it are not the same thing. Simulating weather or nuclear detonations is not equal to creating those real-world phenomena, and similarly a computer containing a detailed model of the brain would not necessarily be thinking like a brain or acting on its thoughts. A big problem for AI, and one that gets little notice in this book, is that nobody has any idea how to program conscious awareness into a machine. That doesn't mean it can never be done, but it does raise doubts about assertions that it will or must occur as more complex circuits get laid down on chips in coming decades. Barrat often refers to AGIs and ASIs as "self aware" and his concerns center on such systems, having awakened, deciding that they have other objectives than the ones humans have programmed into them. One can imagine unconscious "intelligent" agents causing many problems (through glitches or relentless pursuit of some ill-considered programmed objective) but plotting against humanity seems like a job for an entity that knows that it and humans both exist. Interestingly, though, Barrat offers the following dark scenario and sliver of hope: >>I think our Waterloo lies in the foreseeable future, in the AI of tomorrow and the nascent AGI due out in the next decade or two. Our survival, if it is possible, may depend on, among other things, developing AGI with something akin to consciousness and human understanding, even friendliness, built in. That would require, at a minimum, understanding intelligent machines in a fine-grained way, so there'd be no surprises.<< Me: Note that some AI experts, such as Jeff Hawkins, have argued the opposite--that the very lack of human-like desires, such as for power and status, is why AI systems won't turn against their makers. It would be a not-so-small irony if efforts to make AIs more like us make them more dangerous. Our Final Invention is a thought-provoking and valuable book. Even if its alarmism is overstated, as I suspect and hope, there is no denying that the subject Barrat addresses is one in which there is very little that can be said with confidence, and in which the consequences of being wrong are very high indeed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 14, 2014
D
Verified Purchase
daveyd
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
all driven by artificial super intelligence (ASI)
Format: Hardcover
You are peering inside a black hole at a "point" beyond which you cannot see and where no one knows what exists. The point represents a period of time technologically known as Singularity. Even light cannot escape from the point and on the other side it is known only that there is a profound self replicating intelligence greater than our own, all driven by artificial super intelligence (ASI). Physicist Stephen Hawking writes that "In contrast with our intellect, computers double their performance every eighteen months. So the danger is real that they could develop intelligence and take over the world". Computer scientist and professor Vernon Vinge writes that "Within 30 years, we will have the technological means to create super human intelligence. Shortly after the human era will be ended". Our Final Invention is 267 pages of authoritative manuscript that is compelling, fascinating and beyond the fright stage. The book's author on numerous occasions refers to "we" as if there exists a unified collective engaged in artificial general intelligence(AGI) or artificial super intelligence (ASI). The reality is that some 56 nations are currently in different stages of arcane artificial intelligence designs. They include antagonists such as North Korea, Iran and suicide regimes from the Middle East. Russia, China and the U.S. are the biggest players as is Israel. The author believes that super computers fueled by nanotechnology will combine to produce ASI trillions of times more powerful than any human academic or intellectual resources. ASI has the potential to eliminate hunger, poverty, disease and even mortality but disruptions of global economies and politics will be in evidence as balance of powers are shifted. Unemployment dynamics will infect bank tellers, retail clerks, travel agents, loan officers stock brokers.... Computer software designs are so complex, even incomprehensible, that failures are inevitable. The 1986 Chernobyl meltdown, Three Mile Island, and Fukushima were all designed by highly qualified professionals but with complex infrastructures. Under Singularity as computer speeds double with frequency while human intelligence is unchanged, perhaps the musings of Hawking and Vinge will prove to be prescient. Our Final Invention is 267 pages of a very dark subject which not even a trace of a happy Betty Grable ending is to be found. My time has expired. Perhaps the final words were well expressed by Jaan Tallin, cofounder of Skype: 'A hard-hitting book about the most important topic of this century and possibly beyond---the issue of whether our species can survive. I wish it was science fiction but I know it's not'!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2016

recommand products

Creator Detective's Office 10246
162.00
Bilstein 2007+ Toyota Tundra B8 8100 EVO DSA 0-1.5 Rear Right Shock Absorber
404.00
FLIR Weather Cover f/Joystick Control Unit
30.44
SPEC-1 RACING SP-71 Gloss Black 20x8.5 +38 5x112/5x114.3 73.1
125.00
SPEC-1 RACING SPT-33 Matte Bronze Black Lip 17x8 +38 5x114.3/5x100 73.1
195.00