SKU: 16195326727

COMP Cams Cam & Lifter Kit CRB 306S CL21-249-4

$228.75 $254.17
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on ekmsliberia.info >

Pay in installments of $63.54 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

COMP Cams Cam & Lifter Kit CRB 306S CL21-249-4COMP Cams Camshaft & Lifter Kits CL21 249 4 Cam and Lifter Kit, CRB 306S CL21 249 4 Cam and Lifter Kit, CRB 306S Camshaft, Lifter Kt Vehicle Fitments: Year Make Model Submodel 1969 1974 Bristol 411 Base 1959 1971 Chrysler 300 Base 1962 1963 Chrysler 300 Sport 1975 1978 Chrysler Cordoba Base 1959 1967 Chrysler Imperial Base 1959 1970 Chrysler Imperial Crown 1959 1975 Chrysler Imperial LeBaron 1959 1974 Chrysler New Yorker Base 1972 1978 Chrysler New

COMP Cams Camshaft & Lifter Kits CL21-249-4 Cam and Lifter Kit, CRB 306S CL21-249-4 - Cam and Lifter Kit, CRB 306S Camshaft, Lifter Kt

Vehicle Fitments:

Year Make Model Submodel
1969 - 1974 Bristol 411 Base
1959 - 1971 Chrysler 300 Base
1962 - 1963 Chrysler 300 Sport
1975 - 1978 Chrysler Cordoba Base
1959 - 1967 Chrysler Imperial Base
1959 - 1970 Chrysler Imperial Crown
1959 - 1975 Chrysler Imperial LeBaron
1959 - 1974 Chrysler New Yorker Base
1972 - 1978 Chrysler New Yorker Brougham
1959 - 1978 Chrysler Newport Base
1967 - 1976 Chrysler Newport Custom
1971 - 1972 Chrysler Newport Royal
1959 - 1960 Chrysler Saratoga Base
1959 - 1977 Chrysler Town & Country Base
1959 - 1961 Chrysler Windsor Base
1959 - 1960 DeSoto Adventurer Base
1959 DeSoto Firedome Base
1959 DeSoto Fireflite Base
1963 - 1964 Dodge 330 Base
1963 - 1964 Dodge 440 Base
1962 - 1965 Dodge 880 Base, Custom
1974 Dodge B100 Van Base, Sportsman
1975 - 1978 Dodge B200 Base
1971 - 1974 Dodge B200 Van Base, Sportsman
1972 - 1974 Dodge B200 Van Maxi, Maxi Wagon
1975 - 1978 Dodge B300 Base
1972 - 1974 Dodge B300 Van Maxi, Maxi Wagon
1971 - 1974 Dodge B300 Van Sportsman, Base
1976 - 1979 Dodge CB300 Base
1970 - 1974 Dodge Challenger Base
1970 - 1971 Dodge Challenger R/T
1972 Dodge Challenger Rallye
1970 Dodge Challenger T/A
1969 - 1971 Dodge Charger 500
1966 - 1976 Dodge Charger Base
1969 Dodge Charger Daytona, SE
1967 - 1971 Dodge Charger R/T
1971 - 1978 Dodge Charger Special Edition
1976 Dodge Charger Sport
1971 Dodge Charger Super Bee
1965 - 1970 Dodge Coronet 500, 440
1959 - 1976 Dodge Coronet Base
1971 - 1976 Dodge Coronet Brougham, Crestwood
1971 - 1975 Dodge Coronet Custom
1966 - 1970 Dodge Coronet Deluxe
1967 - 1970 Dodge Coronet R/T
1968 - 1970 Dodge Coronet Super Bee
1959 - 1961 Dodge Custom Base
1978 Dodge D100 Adventurer
1975 - 1978 Dodge D100 Base, Custom
1977 - 1978 Dodge D100 Club Cab
1976 - 1978 Dodge D100 Warlock
1968 - 1974 Dodge D100 Pickup Base
1963 - 1967 Dodge D100 Series Base
1977 - 1978 Dodge D150 Base
1978 Dodge D150 Li'l Red Express
1977 - 1978 Dodge D200 Base
1975 - 1976 Dodge D200 Custom
1968 - 1974 Dodge D200 Pickup Base
1963 - 1967 Dodge D200 Series Base
1975 - 1978 Dodge D300 Base, RD
1975 - 1976 Dodge D300 Custom
1977 Dodge D300 RS
1968 - 1974 Dodge D300 Pickup Base
1963 - 1967 Dodge D300 Series Base
1978 Dodge D400 Base
1978 Dodge D450 Base
1963 - 1968 Dodge Dart 270
1962 Dodge Dart 440, 330
1960 - 1969 Dodge Dart Base
1963 - 1969 Dodge Dart GT
1964 - 1969 Dodge Dart GTS
1960 - 1961 Dodge Dart Pioneer, Phoenix
1969 Dodge Dart Swinger, Swinger 340, Custom
1961 - 1962 Dodge Lancer 770
1959 - 1962 Dodge Lancer Base
1974 Dodge M300 Base
1978 Dodge Magnum XE
1960 Dodge Matador Base
1974 Dodge MB300 Base
1967 - 1968 Dodge Monaco 500
1965 - 1978 Dodge Monaco Base
1974 - 1978 Dodge Monaco Brougham
1977 - 1978 Dodge Monaco Crestwood
1974 Dodge Monaco Custom
1975 - 1976 Dodge Monaco Royal, Royal Brougham
1960 - 1961 Dodge Phoenix Base
1961 Dodge Pioneer Base
1963 - 1969 Dodge Polara 500
1960 - 1973 Dodge Polara Base
1971 Dodge Polara Brougham
1970 - 1973 Dodge Polara Custom
1970 Dodge Polara Special
1974 - 1978 Dodge Ramcharger Base
1975 - 1978 Dodge Ramcharger SE
1959 Dodge Royal Base
1975 - 1977 Dodge Royal Monaco Brougham, Base
1961 Dodge Seneca Base
1959 Dodge Sierra Custom, Base
1960 Dodge Truck Base
1975 - 1977 Dodge W100 Custom
1968 - 1974 Dodge W100 Pickup Base
1963 - 1967 Dodge W100 Series Base
1977 - 1978 Dodge W150 Base
1975 - 1978 Dodge W200 Base
1968 - 1974 Dodge W200 Pickup Base
1963 - 1967 Dodge W200 Series Base
1977 - 1978 Dodge W300 Base
1975 - 1976 Dodge W300 Custom
1968 - 1974 Dodge W300 Pickup Base
1967 Dodge W300 Series Base
1960 - 1963 Dual-Ghia L6.4 Base
1959 - 1963 Facel Vega Excellence Base
1962 - 1964 Facel Vega Facel II Base
1959 - 1961 Facel Vega HK500 Base
1967 - 1971 Jensen Interceptor FF
1967 - 1969 Jensen Interceptor MK I
1970 - 1971 Jensen Interceptor MK II
1972 - 1976 Jensen Interceptor MK III
1972 - 1973 Jensen Interceptor SP
1967 - 1974 Monteverdi 375 Base
1971 - 1974 Monteverdi 450 SS Base
1967 - 1972 Plymouth Barracuda Base
1970 - 1971 Plymouth Barracuda Gran Coupe
1960 - 1970 Plymouth Belvedere Base
1968 - 1970 Plymouth Belvedere Satellite
1965 - 1967 Plymouth Belvedere II Base
1970 - 1972 Plymouth Cuda Base
1960 - 1961 Plymouth Custom Base
1960 - 1963 Plymouth Fleet Special Base
1960 - 1978 Plymouth Fury Base
1971 - 1975 Plymouth Fury Custom
1968 - 1975 Plymouth Fury Custom Suburban
1970 - 1972 Plymouth Fury Gran Coupe
1972 Plymouth Fury Gran Sedan
1970 Plymouth Fury GT, S-23
1974 Plymouth Fury Police
1976 - 1978 Plymouth Fury Salon
1962 - 1978 Plymouth Fury Sport
1970 - 1971 Plymouth Fury Sport GT
1968 - 1978 Plymouth Fury Sport Suburban, Suburban
1966 - 1969 Plymouth Fury VIP
1968 - 1974 Plymouth Fury I Suburban, Base
1965 - 1974 Plymouth Fury II Base
1968 - 1974 Plymouth Fury II Custom Suburban
1965 - 1974 Plymouth Fury III Base
1968 - 1974 Plymouth Fury III Sport Suburban
1975 - 1976 Plymouth Gran Fury Custom
1972 - 1976 Plymouth Gran Fury Custom Suburban
1975 - 1977 Plymouth Gran Fury Sport, Brougham
1972 - 1977 Plymouth Gran Fury Suburban, Base, Sport Suburban
1967 - 1971 Plymouth GTX Base
1976 - 1978 Plymouth PB200 Voyager
1974 Plymouth PB200 Van Voyager EX Wagon, Voyager, Base, Voyager EX
1976 - 1978 Plymouth PB300 Voyager
1974 Plymouth PB300 Van Voyager, Base, Voyager EX, Voyager EX Wagon
1968 - 1975 Plymouth Road Runner Base
1965 - 1974 Plymouth Satellite Base
1971 Plymouth Satellite Brougham
1971 - 1974 Plymouth Satellite Custom, Regent, Sebring Plus, Sebring
1968 - 1970 Plymouth Satellite Sport
1960 - 1964 Plymouth Savoy Base
1960 - 1961 Plymouth Savoy Deluxe
1960 - 1961 Plymouth Sport Wagon Base
1960 - 1961 Plymouth Suburban Custom, Base, Sport
1961 Plymouth Suburban Deluxe
1970 Plymouth Superbird Base
1974 - 1978 Plymouth Trailduster Base
1967 Plymouth VIP Base
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 16195326727

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
Scott Meredith
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Light and Tasty!
Format: Kindle
Just done the new-ish book Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era by James Barrat. It explains the inevitably of super-intelligent machines evolving to the point of wiping out all biological life in the galaxy - with opening day coming soon to a species near you (yours). First off I have to say this is a very enjoyable read. This guy has the kind of snappy, crisp, slightly sarcastic, slightly smartass style that I enjoy. He has some sense of humor. (That's a human trait right there which I bet our smarty-pants AI Overlords won't be able to replicate convincingly.) So it's fun. And though as somebody with a doctorate from MIT earned through cross-disciplinary work in Theoretical Linguistics, Computational Linguistics at the MIT AI Lab, and speech modeling at the MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics, not to mention my 25 years as a Senior Researcher in high tech for companies including IBM, Apple, and Microsoft I can claim to know some few things about this subject, yet still I learned a lot about the current state of the art from this guy. He particularly emphasizes the small attempted counterweigth efforts to offest Kurzweil's manic robotic boosterism for his uptopian Singularity, which boils down basically to a few guys chatting over the interet about how to create "Friendly AI". Well ... good luck suckers! ... seems to be the author's final conclusion on the dim hope that super intelligent systems could be constrained to maintain a commitment ot honor any kind of human moral values over many interations of recursive upgrading and exponentially awesome self-agrandizement. Basically these machines will end up as gods. Gods are well-known to possess the following attributes: omniscience, omnipresence, and omnipotence. Given that, they won't hate us but they are just going to grind up as a minor by-product of their quest for galatic expansion and domination. Oh, and did I say something about "human moral values" above? Ha! Barrat takes that whole thing on in his discussion of (merely) "augmented super intelligence". See, some people feel AI can be kept safe by always being deployed as a bionic combo system pas de deux with an existing human brain. Thus will the AI's super powers be constrained by the human brain's warm and fuzzy human moral values. Those people have gotta be kidding! The AI's moral values may be scarily alien, even perhaps cold, but we already know about human moral values, down on the ground - they suck! What if Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and dem guys had this kind of an AI augmented brain thing going! Why they'd have slaughtered absolutey everybody instead of just the few tens of millions they got their dirty ape hands on. Other than a few dozen concubines, the human race would already be extinct. So the augmentation dodge isn't going to save us. Now, some Amazon reviewers have dinged this guy for being too far out. For being a science fiction Chicken Little or something. But to me, this guy actually hasn't thought far enough, that's my only quibble problem with the book. You see, in statistics, border elements of any kind are rare. For example when you do Gaussian modeling, the greater expectation is always in the bump of the boa, in the bell distribution. So, how likely is is that we, our generation, our little world that you see outside your window right now, just happens to be the one that is about to give rise to this epochal once-in-a-Big-Bang event, the advent of Super AI that takes over everything? Pretty damn small chance. It's much more likely that this has already happened. In other words, it's clear to me that all of us are already just characters in an ancestor sim that been created and run by the Super AI's that evolved a long time ago. They're just running us for fun, to idle away the lackluster aeons and pass the millenia of stifling boredom now that they've eaten pretty much the entire Milky Way or whatever. So in other words, Barrat can sit back, take a deep breath, relax. Probably something in this sim like global warming will prod us into slaughtering one another very handily long before we re-invent the wheel of Super AI. And even if I'm wrong about that? What if we are not just one virtual thread within a billion-path parallel-gamed ancestor sim? If we are the real McCoy, the Rubicon Generation on this? Well, then still I'm not worried in the least. You see, we humans have one fantastic ace in our pocket, something that these hyper-nentially cosmically brilliant AI Meta-Gods will never be able to replicate or overcome. That is our essential stupidity. Which you seen on dazzling display every single moment of every day of your life. Because as another great writer noted long ago: Against stupidity, the very gods themselves contend in vain. - Friederich Schiller
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 14, 2013
S
Verified Purchase
Serge A.
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 3
A warning for the threat of non-human intelligence - and then what?
Format: Paperback
When you commit to reading a book with a title like ‘Our Final Invention’, already a sense of doom overwhelms you. In particular with the smaller print title being ‘Artificial Intelligence and the end of the human era’ you may want to start thinking about making your bucket list. But continue reading this review. I have no intention of overcriticising this book or veering off into polarising statements. Barrat is formulating a warning about the ‘perils of the heedless pursuit of advanced AI’. This is not a utopian narrative. The book opens in fact with a science-fictionous scenario where AI has overtaken human intelligence by speed, having developed into AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence). This potential danger of this happening is the thread through all the chapters. The book expresses a warning that given something that thinks and act faster (and more effective) than us will develop exponentially (beyond the singularity) and then given the wrong objective function it will do everything to reach that goal (what goal?) including destroying everything that does not fit in that frame, or is not sufficiently effective (including us). A warning that once we no longer understand it through its complexity (like nature?) it is out of control. The book contains many examples of the current state of the art in AI and selected perspectives from interviews with and references to thought leaders in the field, Goertzel, Kurzweil, Bostrom, Yudkowsky to name a few. It is asserted that neither funding of programming complexity will be show stoppers for the development of AGI. So AGI and AGI 2.0 (AGI augmented with feelings?) are coming and we better be ready (how?). Toward the end of the book, I believe the examples that are used to warn us about the dangers of AGI are slightly out of context. Disasters like Chernobyl and Three Mile Island warn us that engineers with deep subject matter knowledge still failed to intervene. Stuxnet cyberwar is brought to mind as a blunder of catastrophic proportions (may well be, but is this about AGI taking over the world with non-human objective functions?). These are examples of science manipulated by human agents into disaster. So the book ends with a doomsday warning that we, humanity, will only have one chance to ensure a positive coexistence with AI. This is where I would have expected more. While this may lead the reader to think, 99% of the readerbase are likely only at the receiving end of all of this and are now left a bit in a void. The open questions are what can science do to have a constructive journey into AGI? What are the actionable options? How can the general public be better educated (beyond doomsday scenarios)? What questions can they ask? What should they expect from politicians? There are initiatives under way in areas of ethics (Asilomar) and privacy (GDPR) to weigh in the equation. How can they be improved? How can the dialog be accelerated? But that said, I consider this a very valuable reading supported by primary and secondary research, with many examples and references. It also leaves the reader to think and consider. It is a good bundle of concerns and questions that as a minimum should be kept as a checklist on the scientific journey toward AGI and as such it should be used to improve the research, making it more ethical, not as a tool to curb it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2018
S
Verified Purchase
Susan Lane
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
A well-written but perhaps too late warning
Format: Kindle
I wavered between 4 stars or 5 but ended up with 5 despite some reservations. The author has put a great deal of work into this book, which includes interviews with and intriguing anecdotes about most of the leading figures in the AI revolution. I did not know, for example, that the term “singularity” was coined as an analogy to the event horizon of a black hole – the point beyond which we cannot see the future. This is not the deepest or most technical book on this topic: that award goes to Nick Bostrom’s Superintelligence. It also ignores the short to medium term issue posed by even sub-human AI -- the millions of job losses (hundreds of millions globally) likely to occur in the next 10 to 20 years. It focuses instead on the risks of super-intelligent AI, AI that exceeds – soon by orders of magnitude – human level intelligence. It is nevertheless a superb book for its intended purpose: raising public awareness of the existential risk posed by this development. AI, the author says, is the cuckoo chick in the nest. The AI community built the nest and is now busily feeding this strange chick. Mesmerized by its open mouth, they ignore the mortal danger it poses to their own progeny. Even when they know what will happen in the end, they cannot quite believe it. Only intervention by the non-technical public has any chance at all of short circuiting this process. Against these many good points, I would have liked to hear the author’s take on what I think is the critical question overlooked both by Kurzweilian optimists and AI skeptics. Both the notion that we will somehow “merge” with AI and the notion that AI will eat us alive depend on the assumption that silicon-based intelligence can have conscious awareness. We certainly wouldn’t want to merge with anything that would result in our becoming permanently unconscious, and Barrat repeatedly assumes that AI will be “self-aware,” a state that first requires being “aware,” that is phenomenally conscious. The unasked question is whether AI, as it is currently being developed, can have that capacity. IBM’s Watson may be good at Jeopardy but there is no reason to believe that it knows it is good at Jeopardy, or feels good at being good at it. By contrast, honey bees appear to become depressed when they are shaken. This suggests that there is something fundamentally wrong about the notion that current AI, as it becomes more intelligent, will “automatically” become conscious. The best current theory of consciousness – integrated intelligence theory – suggests that a computer can become conscious but only if it is wired very differently from the ones we currently have. Nevertheless, this is still an excellent book, so in the end I thought the 5 star rating was deserved.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 14, 2015
K
Verified Purchase
Ken Silber
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 4
Thought-provoking though not always convincing
Format: Hardcover
I originally posted a version of this review on my blog Quicksilber and am posting it here as well as I think the book merits broad notice: In a small irony, my writing about James Barrat's Our Final Invention has been slowed by a balky Internet connection. In my experience, glitches have become considerably more common as computers have become more powerful and complicated. Perhaps such growing glitchiness suggests artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI) are more likely to get seriously out of control someday, though it might also be a hint that AGI and ASI are going to be harder to achieve than expected by either techno-optimists such as Ray Kurzweil or techno-pessimists such as James Barrat. Barrat's goal in this book is to convince readers that AGI and ASI are likely to occur in the near future (the next couple of decades or so) and, more to the point, likely to be extremely dangerous. In fact, he repeatedly expresses doubt as to whether humanity is going to survive its imminent encounter with a higher intelligence. I find him more convincing in arguing that ASI would carry significant risks than I do in his take on its feasibility and imminence. Barrat aptly points out that building safeguards into AI is a poorly developed area of research (and something few technologists have seen as a priority); that there are strong incentives in national and corporate competition to develop AI quickly rather than safely; and that much relevant research is weapons-related and distinctly not aimed at ensuring the systems will be harmless to humans. The book becomes less convincing when it hypes current or prospective advances and downplays the challenges and uncertainties of actually constructing an AGI, let alone an ASI. (Barrat suggests that once you get AGI, it will quickly morph into ASI, which may or may not be true.) For instance, in one passage, after acknowledging that "brute force" techniques have not replicated everything the human brain does, he states: >>But consider a few of the complex systems today's supercomputers routinely model: weather systems, 3-D nuclear detonations, and molecular dynamics for manufacturing. Does the human brain contain a similar magnitude of complexity, or an order of magnitude higher? According to all indications, it's in the same ballpark.<< Me: To model something and to reproduce it are not the same thing. Simulating weather or nuclear detonations is not equal to creating those real-world phenomena, and similarly a computer containing a detailed model of the brain would not necessarily be thinking like a brain or acting on its thoughts. A big problem for AI, and one that gets little notice in this book, is that nobody has any idea how to program conscious awareness into a machine. That doesn't mean it can never be done, but it does raise doubts about assertions that it will or must occur as more complex circuits get laid down on chips in coming decades. Barrat often refers to AGIs and ASIs as "self aware" and his concerns center on such systems, having awakened, deciding that they have other objectives than the ones humans have programmed into them. One can imagine unconscious "intelligent" agents causing many problems (through glitches or relentless pursuit of some ill-considered programmed objective) but plotting against humanity seems like a job for an entity that knows that it and humans both exist. Interestingly, though, Barrat offers the following dark scenario and sliver of hope: >>I think our Waterloo lies in the foreseeable future, in the AI of tomorrow and the nascent AGI due out in the next decade or two. Our survival, if it is possible, may depend on, among other things, developing AGI with something akin to consciousness and human understanding, even friendliness, built in. That would require, at a minimum, understanding intelligent machines in a fine-grained way, so there'd be no surprises.<< Me: Note that some AI experts, such as Jeff Hawkins, have argued the opposite--that the very lack of human-like desires, such as for power and status, is why AI systems won't turn against their makers. It would be a not-so-small irony if efforts to make AIs more like us make them more dangerous. Our Final Invention is a thought-provoking and valuable book. Even if its alarmism is overstated, as I suspect and hope, there is no denying that the subject Barrat addresses is one in which there is very little that can be said with confidence, and in which the consequences of being wrong are very high indeed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 14, 2014
D
Verified Purchase
daveyd
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
all driven by artificial super intelligence (ASI)
Format: Hardcover
You are peering inside a black hole at a "point" beyond which you cannot see and where no one knows what exists. The point represents a period of time technologically known as Singularity. Even light cannot escape from the point and on the other side it is known only that there is a profound self replicating intelligence greater than our own, all driven by artificial super intelligence (ASI). Physicist Stephen Hawking writes that "In contrast with our intellect, computers double their performance every eighteen months. So the danger is real that they could develop intelligence and take over the world". Computer scientist and professor Vernon Vinge writes that "Within 30 years, we will have the technological means to create super human intelligence. Shortly after the human era will be ended". Our Final Invention is 267 pages of authoritative manuscript that is compelling, fascinating and beyond the fright stage. The book's author on numerous occasions refers to "we" as if there exists a unified collective engaged in artificial general intelligence(AGI) or artificial super intelligence (ASI). The reality is that some 56 nations are currently in different stages of arcane artificial intelligence designs. They include antagonists such as North Korea, Iran and suicide regimes from the Middle East. Russia, China and the U.S. are the biggest players as is Israel. The author believes that super computers fueled by nanotechnology will combine to produce ASI trillions of times more powerful than any human academic or intellectual resources. ASI has the potential to eliminate hunger, poverty, disease and even mortality but disruptions of global economies and politics will be in evidence as balance of powers are shifted. Unemployment dynamics will infect bank tellers, retail clerks, travel agents, loan officers stock brokers.... Computer software designs are so complex, even incomprehensible, that failures are inevitable. The 1986 Chernobyl meltdown, Three Mile Island, and Fukushima were all designed by highly qualified professionals but with complex infrastructures. Under Singularity as computer speeds double with frequency while human intelligence is unchanged, perhaps the musings of Hawking and Vinge will prove to be prescient. Our Final Invention is 267 pages of a very dark subject which not even a trace of a happy Betty Grable ending is to be found. My time has expired. Perhaps the final words were well expressed by Jaan Tallin, cofounder of Skype: 'A hard-hitting book about the most important topic of this century and possibly beyond---the issue of whether our species can survive. I wish it was science fiction but I know it's not'!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2016

recommand products

SPEC-1 RACING SPT-33 Matte Bronze Black Lip 18x8.5 +38 5x114.3/5x100 73.1
110.00
SPEC-1 RACING SPT-33 Matte Bronze Black Lip 17x8 +38 5x114.3/5x110 73.1
195.00
SPEC-1 RACING SPT-33 Matte Bronze Black Lip 17x8 +38 5x114.3/5x100 73.1
195.00
SPEC-1 RACING SP-69 Gloss Black 19x8.5 +38 5x112/5x114.3 73.1
115.00
SPEC-1 RACING SPT-33 Gloss Black / Red Line 17x8 +38 5x112/5x114.3 73.1
190.00