Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 13 - Jul 18
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
B70042RSD-T-P4S-UL FAGTechnische Basisdaten Brand FAG Produkttitel B7004 C 2RSD T P4S UL FAG Teilnummer des Herstellers 0191500160000 InnendurchmesserMM 20 AuendurchmesserMM 42 ueres Breitenma in Milimeter 12 InnendurchmesserInch 0. 7874 AuendurchmesserInch 1. 6535 ueres Breitenma in Zoll 0. 4724 Gewicht in Kilogramm 0. 07 Abdichtung 2RU Two Abdichtungs Non Contact Type Przision P4S Przision (Higher than P4) Contact Angle 15 degrees Pairing G Universal Pairing Axial
Technische Basisdaten
| Brand | FAG |
| Produkttitel | B7004-C-2RSD-T-P4S-UL FAG |
| Teilnummer des Herstellers | 0191500160000 |
| InnendurchmesserMM | 20 |
| AußendurchmesserMM | 42 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß in Milimeter | 12 |
| InnendurchmesserInch | 0.7874 |
| AußendurchmesserInch | 1.6535 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß in Zoll | 0.4724 |
| Gewicht in Kilogramm | 0.07 |
| Abdichtung | 2RU - Two Abdichtungs / Non Contact Type |
| Präzision | P4S Präzision (Higher than P4) |
| Contact Angle | 15 degrees |
| Pairing | G - Universal Pairing |
| Axial Internal Clearance / Preload | UL - Universal design for fitting in pairs, bearing pair has slight preload in O and X arrangements |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß in Milimeter | 12 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) | 4250 |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) | 10300 |
| Basic static load rating, radial (C 0r) | "4250.0000" |
| ECLASS number | 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number | 23-05-08-03 |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 1196 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable
Size: One Size, Color: Green
Comfortable socks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
★★★★★ 2
small and tight
Size: One Size, Color: Green
didn’t care for them
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 17, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Disappointed
Size: One Size, Color: Black
These socks seem thinner than in the past. Quality not as good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Perfect fit
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Black
Durable and comfortable. Size works well. Very soft with nice thickness for training. Fairly long lasting
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Post-COVID Sock Hunt: Finally a Win
Size: Medium, Color: (001) Black / Black / White
Ever since COVID, I haven’t been able to find a pair of socks that hold up for more than a few months. Brands like UA, Adidas, and others seem to have cut corners—likely in response to inflation—by downgrading materials and labor rather than raising prices. The result? Socks that wear thin, rip easily, or lose shape fast.
These, however, have been a pleasant surprise. I’ve been wearing them for a few weeks and so far, they’re holding strong. You can tell some cost-saving measures were still made—certain areas feel slightly thinner—but overall, the construction is solid.
A key win: they stay on. These are ankle socks (not “no-shows”), and they hug the ankle securely. That’s a huge plus in a world where most post-COVID no-shows slide off halfway through the day.
We may never get back to the pre-COVID quality standards without paying a premium, but for now, these are a reliable choice.
Ratings:
• No slipping: 10/10
• Price: 7/10
• Durability (so far): No pilling or loose threads — promising start.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2025